Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
I am an investigative journalist who has been researching the Alex Salmond case. I am not alone as there are to my knowledge at least three television programmes doing the same thing. I make no claim to be impartial, partially because of my sympathy towards the independence movement and partially because my previous work has dealt substantially with failings in the criminal justice system. As far as the criminal case against Alex Salmond is concerned I will not be able to publish or comment until it is over. However the expenses settlement last week of Alex Salmond’s successful civil action allows me , without any prejudice, to relate just a few the dramatic and deeply troubling things I have already discovered about the civil case. The public will be the jury in Hollie’s Case which I will now place before you and you can reach your own conclusions.
Both Boris and Farage are in No Deal meltdown (both would like a compromise deal but have boxed themselves in fearful of their voters) and will suffer at the polls if Corbyn can make it to the General Election and offer a popular Brext compromise. If NS aim is devolution in EU, then opposing Brexit rather than using it as an opportunity for Independence makes sense, as this shows her ‘progressive’ as opposed to ‘deplorable’ credentials and has resulted in Labour agreeing to another non-independence vote. So really her strategy is working, its just not intended to secure independence. Hollie began naming more of her abusers, which ultimately totalled 22 people. These names included a Sheriff (Scottish equivalent of a High Court Judge), a forensic policeman, a lawyer and Hollie's own social worker. Sensing that a powerful Scottish elite had been abusing her daughter, Anne made several attempts to encourage Aberdeen police to investigate. On each occasion, police found no evidence of such a paedophile ring, which only riled her fears of a cover-up.
A further consequence of the change from solemn to summary was the loss of legal aid support for Mr. Green. This removed Mr. Green’s legal defence team, led by Donald Findlay QC, and resulted in Mr. Green briefly having to defend himself. On 13 April 2011, Mr. Green appeared in Stonehaven Sheriff Court, facing PF [Procurator Fiscal, Scottish state prosecutor] Anne Currie. Ms. Currie’s response was to seek an accelerated process and an early trial date commencing on 5 June 2011. This remarkable position, on the face of it completely indefensible in terms of natural justice, was defended by Ms. Currie on the basis of an assertion that fifty people had been distressed by Mr. Green’s campaign and of those, she stated, half were suffering from trauma as a result.
This new report is from a friend of impeccable credentials with whom I am collaborating; it reveals stunning new facts on the Alex Salmond affair: Another common tactic, with an example from the Guardian shown on screen, is to hire in psychologists to claim that all SRA allegations are false memories or stoked by silly Christians. Yet the victims describe perpetrators’ genitals in great detail, as well as describing sexual practices that they could not have read about in books. Wong’s response: “How could [all the victims] be colluding with each other across the Atlantic?” Very few horror videos go into detail on SRA issues; the claims are not inspired by video nasties. Besides, there is no hard scientific evidence to underpin “false memory” theory. The very real trauma that survivors experience, especially on significant dates in the Satanist calendar on which they were abused, cannot have been caused by something made-up.However, as Lord President you are surely in a position to start righting the many wrongs that continue to emerge as a result of the initial refusal by both police and Crown Office to investigate a long series of brutal and well-attested crimes.
The case of Hollie Greig, whose abuse allegations in Aberdeen have never been properly investigated, is discussed. Hollie has said that she was once forced to eat part of the sacrificial victim, which is common in SRA. On another occasion, Hollie was forced to drink a sacrificed dog’s blood. In trying to win justice for Hollie and the thousands of other child victims like her, Robert has been imprisoned twice, and effectively held under house arrest for a year, reporting to Cheshire police daily. So draconian are the restrictions placed upon him that the wider public would assume he is a dangerous man and a threat to society. On the contrary he is simply a peaceful and good man who has done nothing but peacefully campaign against child abuse. Robert is still waiting to clear his name in yet another trial, the date for which has still to be set. On 24 January, Sheriff Bowen found Mr. Green guilty of breach of the peace and breach of bail conditions. The sentencing hearing was set for 17 February 2012. Strange parallels with Catalonia, when the self-styled highly-principled father of Catalanism and latter-day convert to independence, declared himself a tax evader and confessed to having a huge fortune abroad undeclared, but apparently inherited from his father during the Spanish civil war, offering no evidence but his word. This was 5 years ago. All respondents affirm to the best of their knowledge full disclosure is provided with motives logically identified.So, with all that in mind, let’s imagine our own alternative kittens GIF … One with all the kittens doing their own thing – some on the floor, some on the table, some under the couch, some on top of the couch – all doing what interests them most. Then, instead of Special studio guest: child protection campaigner of 22 years’ standing Wilfred Wong, originally trained as a barrister and with expertise in Satanic ritual abuse. Since the trial, further information has come to light and Mr. Kenny MacAskill, former Justice Secretary, and the Justice Directorate have both confirmed Elish Angiolini’s key role in the 2009 decision not to proceed on the Hollie Greig case. This blatantly contradicts correspondence from the Crown Office concerning the handling of the case. These events reinforce Mr Green’s contention that he was acting correctly, dutifully and honourably in the face of official deceit, dissembling and cover-up. Whilst with SW Nichola Foot, Hollie is injected in her leg, called a liar and becomes disorientated. convictions that have become final because they were not appealed timeously, and appeals that have been finally disposed of by the High Court of Justiciary, must be treated as incapable of being brought under review on the ground that there was a miscarriage of justice because the accused did not have access to a solicitor while he was detained prior to the police interview. The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission must make up its own mind, if it is asked to do so, as to whether it would be in the public interest for those cases to be referred to the High Court. It will be for the appeal court to decide what course it ought to take if a reference were to be made to it on those grounds by the Commission.” (UK Supreme Court 2010, para 62)
The extent of efforts made to cover up all mentions of SRA is itself an indication that there is something in it. Details are shown on screen and read out of how MPs were intimidated by other MPs not to expose MPs’ involvement in child sexual abuse. Mark Daly, Cathy Long (BBC Radio Scotland) and Liam MacDougall (Panorama) silenced with threats of job loss if they continue with this or any other paedophilia investigations in Scotland. To understand the scam around the fake independence of the Goddard Inquiry into child sexual abuse, viewers should read the article www.ukcolumn.org/article/acting-outside-authority-goddards-csa-inquiryBased on the evidence before me, which is outlined below, I believe that Mr. George Robert Green has suffered a miscarriage of justice warranting reference of his whole case to the High Court. Further, I argue in the following text that it is strongly in the interest of justice that a reference should be made. Introduction Surely there are highly placed individuals within the BBC with sufficient integrity and courage to help to expose these appalling crimes and protect some of our country’s most vulnerable young people. This same opportunity for comment was taken up with gusto last week by the mainstream media in Scotland. Their coverage centred on the scale of the legal expenses agreed to be paid by the Scottish Government to Alex Salmond. This was followed up by the Sunday Mail and the Sunday Post last weekend with stories suggesting that Salmond’s lawyers might have been overcharging and blaming the Scottish Government for not having them independently audited.
Great Deal 
New Comment